Share
Suad Skenderi

Suad Skenderi

Suad Skenderi graduated Political Science, International Relations and Journalism at FON University, Macedonia and acquired his Master of Arts degree in Political Science at the Central European University - Budapest. From 2008 to 2012, he has worked as an assistant in the sector for Human Rights and Inter-ethnic relations at "Mesecina" - Gostivar. Currently he is an executive director at Romalitico, the academic medium related to Roma policy analyses. He is interested in data visualizations, infographics, advocacy, minority politics, politics of identity, representation, participation and good governance. In addition, he has contributed for the Balkanist, Bright Green, European Student Think Tank, Nationalia, Iul Pianus
Suad Skenderi
ohrid-the-antic-theatre-1219839-1280x960

The antic theater in Ohrid, Macedonia

Amid the political crisis, recently the agenda swiftly shifted to the everlasting issue which burdens the country’s progress in the Euro-Atlantic integrations. The use of the name “Macedonia”, or the name dispute between Greece and Macedonia, once again became a hotly debated issue after the Macedonian Prime Minister made a confusing set of statements this month for the international and national media.

Author: Suad Skenderi


Therefore, the public debated if the Republic of Macedonia is really ready to change its name in order to progress towards the EU and NATO or was it merely an attempt to discredit the current government and their diplomatic potential?

Having the same government for nine years in Macedonia, I doubt that the strategy changed and patriotism suddenly died. In my opinion, the government has constantly avoided putting reforms needed for EU integration on the agenda and the blame for the issues of integration was directed towards the EU and Greece.

Who are you to claim the name?

It has been a quarrel between Greece and Macedonia since the independence of the latter in 1991. This diplomatic battle lasts for 24 years, a dispute that has no precedent in international relations. The bilateral tensions of these two countries affected many societal spheres. After Macedonia proclaimed independence, the country faced fierce political and economic pressure by Greece.

In 1995, Greece imposed an embargo to Macedonia in order to change its flag. The first Macedonian flag, or the Vergina flag, has a diverse history for both of the countries. As a result of this pressure, in 1995 Macedonia changed its flag and the countries signed an interim accord in which Greece will recognize Macedonia under the name of Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia [FYR Macedonia]. In addition, the UN appointed a mediator for the name issue in order to find a common ground between these two countries. Macedonia could eventually eradicate the provision if both of the countries negotiate with the help of Matthew Nimetz, the mediator, for a compromise. However, the dispute still exists, the interim accord was violated and the countries did not come to a solution.

Mandate after a mandate, ruling parties changed in both of the countries but the issue remained rock solid. Greece in the negotiations set the “red line” of compromise, and every government followed the guide. While in Macedonia, government after a government changed the strategy towards the name dispute. However, right-wing government in Macedonia, which lasts for 9 years thus far, claims to be more patriotic and froze the progress.

Misunderstood or missed the point?

Things got messy after the most recent meeting between the Greek and Macedonian Ministers for Foreign Affairs, which was followed by a controversial interview with the Macedonian Prime Minister by The Guardian. The spark continued in full swing after the Foreign Policy and Debating Europe republished the article.

According to the headline, “Macedonia is ready to change its name after a 24-year dispute with Greece” and as a part of the interview, the Prime Minister said “We are ready to discuss, to open dialogue with them, and to find some solution.” This made a lot of stakeholders interested and people both shocked and happy for the progress after 24 years. When spotted, the Prime Minister reacted to the domestic media saying that the international media misinterpreted the interview and the government remains with the claim that Macedonia will not change its name. The Guardian changed the headline, the content and provided a more subtle approach towards the name dispute. The Foreign Policy remained with the same odd misinterpretation while Debating Europe started a debate on whether the name change is a good idea or not.

Where do these rivals stand?

Macedonia must understand that the people will not lose their identity if the country adds a geographical reference to the name. While Greece should understand that Macedonia once compromised for the flag and Greece should reconsider their “red line” in the negotiation. What we need more than anything is an open dialogue and readiness of both sides for finding a solution.

For many people my argument is irrational because the identity of the Republic of Macedonia is related to the name, the language and the culture. However, Macedonia would only add a prefix to the name, and keep everything else related to the identity. In this scenario, Macedonia would solve a long-lasting issue and eventually join the EU.

On the one hand, the strategy of the current government for the EU integration rests on the support of their electorate. This means that the electorate, through a referendum, will have the chance to decide if Macedonia accepts an addition to the name or not. In their defense, the name is a sensitive issue and this should be the will of the people. On the other hand, the constant nationalist propaganda with policies and advertisements and other tools for impact on the public opinion jeopardizes the idea of a democratic referendum.

In addition, reconsidering the “red line” means that Greece should recognize the seriousness of the issue and include some flexibility in the solution. Throughout the years, almost all of the mainstream Greek parties neglected the importance of the name dispute because Greece is in a more comfortable situation having the Euro-Atlantic lobby suspending Macedonia to integrate.

In my opinion, Greece would also benefit if Macedonia becomes part of the EU because the borders would open; there would not be any reasons for fear of irredentism and identity clashes but an opportunity to celebrate the European values together. In this scenario, both of the countries would use an opportunity to show their stability and seriousness and would profit by enriching their cooperation in many spheres.

Tags: , , ,

Suad Skenderi
Suad Skenderi graduated Political Science, International Relations and Journalism at FON University, Macedonia and acquired his Master of Arts degree in Political Science at the Central European University - Budapest. From 2008 to 2012, he has worked as an assistant in the sector for Human Rights and Inter-ethnic relations at "Mesecina" - Gostivar. Currently he is an executive director at Romalitico, the academic medium related to Roma policy analyses. He is interested in data visualizations, infographics, advocacy, minority politics, politics of identity, representation, participation and good governance. In addition, he has contributed for the Balkanist, Bright Green, European Student Think Tank, Nationalia, Iul Pianus

6 Responses to “That is My Name! – The Battle for the Name Macedonia” Subscribe

  1. Greek 16/01/2016 at 5:36 pm #

    What a load of evasive racist crock. The former Yugoslavians have done an identity quick change from Slavs into “ancient Macedonians” right before the eyes of their patronizing Greek hating apologists and manipulate the name to promote irredentism against.

    Greeks warned this would happen 20 years ago but were ridiculed by pretentious bigots that today act like they don’t notice to hide their mistake of ridiculously calling SLAVS living in ancient Paeonia “Macedonia”. Given their unethical evasions Greeks should extend hostility to those that call former Yugoslavians “Macedonians” by working to destroy their identities to give them a taste of their own medicine towards Greeks.

  2. Greek 16/01/2016 at 5:45 pm #

    “and keep everything else related to the identity.”

    And what identity is that you unethical bigot? The obvious ethnic Bulgarian one they hide and oppress? The qualified
    “Macedonian” regional one where they are still Slavs? Or the ones where they are founders of the Hellenistic period? (aka… Greeks that hate anything Greek) Did you miss the giant Alexander statue and their recent identity change into “ancient Macedonians”?

    As a Greek I not only feel a mounting sense of hostility towards former Yugoslavians but also toward the patronizing Greek hating trolls that keep narrating what Greeks should do. The whole point of changing names is to avoid mixing up Greek history with their own Slavic one which has NOTHING to do with ancient Macedon. As long as the Slavs in Paeonia attempt to do that, to promote irredentism, the hostility will continue between our nations.

    And as long as apologists of the former Yugolsavians unethically evade over their blatently obvious irrdentism and identity theft… play ethnic engineers to hide their mistake of calling them “Macedonians”… Greeks will start to feel mounting hostility towards them as well.

    That hostility is well earned. Now that they have turned into “ancient Macedonians”… and Skopians apologists evade…. they are now effectively morally complicit in subtle attempt to ethnic cleanse Greeks. No excuses left for Skopian apologists.

    .

  3. Nick the Greek 21/02/2016 at 7:00 pm #

    1- The Macedonian name belongs in the Greek domain.

    2- Macedonian identity belongs to Greek heritage.

    Names can be adopted but identity is inherited.

    Fact: Macedonians have always been a Greek-speaking Hellenic-peoples…a regional-historical people-group of ethnic-Greek stock.

    Fact: FYRoM is not Macedon. FYRoM language is not Macedonian language. FYRoM inhabitants are not Macedonian…at least, not in the Greek sense of that word.

  4. Maria the Greek 04/03/2016 at 4:03 pm #

    So blocking the borders and not allowing refugees into FYROM from Greece is a tactic of the Government in Skopje to destabilise Greece and hope that they will apply enough pressure on Greece to give in and handover the name Macedonia? This is what I read into this article and the events of late on the border.

    I don’t think Greece should budge on the name. FYROM has a population of 1 million. The Macedonia in Greece has a population of 2 million. Apart from the historic signifcance, this fact alone doesn’t give FYROM the right to the name as the true Macedonians outnumber you. There is no such language as Macedonian, in Skopje they speak slavic. Macedonian speak Greek.

    Greece does not dictate to FYROM what name or flag to adopt, just to choose any of the million possibilities that are not Greek or offensive to Greeks. Countries have to choose their national symbols based on International norms. (i.e. Can Cuba change its name to Florida, employ the statue of Liberty as its flag and start propaganda that the Florida state in the USA belongs to Cuba, by virtue of so many Cubans living there?)

    Naming a country after a neighboring region is a de facto irredentist strategy aimed at destabilizing the region, and hoping that the country, will absorb the neighboring region.

    In my opinion Greece shouldn’t compromise on the name and FYROM has more to lose than Greece. I as a Greek will not compromise my heritage and identity that rightfully belongs to us. Yes we are hostile as all of Skopjes recent actions are nothing more than provocations towards Greece and falsification of history that isn’t theirs.

    Macedonia is Greek and will always be Greek.

  5. Lance 29/11/2016 at 3:00 pm #

    Greece has repressed minorities for more than a century. It is a racist and ultra-nationalistic system that doesn’t want to evolve. The Macedonia name issue is just one of many issues for Greece – the Roma issue, the Turk issue, the Vlach issue, the Albanian issue. It’s time for the Greek internet trolls to see the light.

  6. Serres 12/02/2017 at 7:26 am #

    LanceOVSKI what repressed minorities?
    STOP your FYROMSKI propaganda as FACTS.
    Have you been to Greece? Go there and you will see that these so called repressed minorities only exist in FYROMS propagandist newspapers NOT IN GREECE.

Leave a Reply

*