•  
  •  
  •  
  •  

POLITHEOR

European Policy Network

  • Home
  • Policy Fields
    • EU Governance and Politics
    • Social and Economic Policy
    • International Relations and Global Affairs
    • Environment and Energy
    • Human Rights and Migration
    • Digital Policy and Internet Governance
    • International Trade
    • Financial Policy and International Markets
  • About us
  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Board
  • Politheor Internship
  • Contact us

pension gap

  • Home
  •  
  • pension gap



  • Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap

    Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap0

    • Op-ed, Social and Economic Policy
    • 22/11/2017

    The Pan-European Personal Pension Product (PEPP) is a Commission-led proposal to close the pension gap in a cost-effective way. Its benefits would eventually spread across multiple fronts: improving the sustainability of pension systems, strengthening the current fiscal and macroeconomic framework, unlocking long-term investment, and contributing to deeper economic integration.

    READ MORE
  • Most Read
  • Commented
  • Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap
    The paradise paradox: Maldives, a sinking country?
    • Environment and Energy, Human Rights and Migration, Op-ed
    • 24/03/2019
  • Pokémon GO: To regulate or not to regulate?
    • Digital Policy and Internet Governance, Op-ed, Social and Economic Policy
    • 03/08/2016
  • Policy Research Internship
    • Opportunities
    • 22/10/2018
  • Politheor's Special Report on RIO 2016: Perspectives beyond the mega-event
    • International Relations and Global Affairs, Special Report
    • 27/06/2016
  • Apple, Ireland and the EU: considerations on just corporate tax regimes
    • EU Governance and Politics, Financial Policy and International Markets, Op-ed
    • 16/10/2016
  • Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap
    Supplying sustainable fashion: traces of promises, but no accountability
    • Environment and Energy, Op-ed
    • 22/12/2019
  • Policy Research Internship
    • Opportunities
    • 22/10/2018
  • The paradise paradox: Maldives, a sinking country?
    • Environment and Energy, Human Rights and Migration, Op-ed
    • 24/03/2019
  • Pokémon GO: To regulate or not to regulate?
    • Digital Policy and Internet Governance, Op-ed, Social and Economic Policy
    • 03/08/2016
  • Apple, Ireland and the EU: considerations on just corporate tax regimes
    • EU Governance and Politics, Financial Policy and International Markets, Op-ed
    • 16/10/2016

Latest Posts

  • Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap
    Pan-European pension schemes – a way to close the pension gap
    • Op-ed, Social and Economic Policy
    • 22/11/2017

Twitter

Tweets by @Politheor

Tags

analysis biodiversity Brazil Brexit China climate change education education policy energy energy policy Environment environmental policy EU EU governance European Commission European Parliament European public policy European Union Gender gender equality human rights interview IT and public policy migration Migration policy NATO Op-ed refugee crisis refugees rio 2016 Russia SDGs Simon Marijsse social policy special report sustainability terrorism trade Trump TTIP Turkey UK United Kingdom United States women rights

Disclaimer

The views, opinions and positions expressed by the authors and those providing comments are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions or positions of the Politheor Network.

Search